In a recent opinion piece for The New York Times, conservative writer David French made a bold statement: he’s voting for Kamala Harris. This may come as a surprise to many, as Harris is the Democratic nominee for Vice President and French is a well-known conservative. But in his article, French explains his reasoning and makes a compelling case for why he believes Harris is the best choice for the future of conservatism.
French begins by acknowledging the current state of American politics, which he describes as “a dumpster fire.” He points to the divisive rhetoric and actions of both President Trump and the Democratic party, and argues that this toxic environment is not sustainable for the future of conservatism. As a conservative himself, French is deeply concerned about the direction in which his party is heading and believes that it is time for a change.
He then goes on to explain why he believes Kamala Harris is the best candidate to “save conservatism from itself.” French praises Harris for her intelligence, experience, and strong track record as a prosecutor and senator. He also notes that she has a more moderate voting record than some of her Democratic colleagues, making her a more palatable choice for conservatives. French believes that Harris has the ability to bring people together and bridge the gap between the two sides of the political spectrum.
But it’s not just Harris’s qualifications that have convinced French to vote for her. He also admires her character and values. French describes Harris as a “person of integrity” who has shown a willingness to listen and learn from others. He believes that she has the ability to lead with empathy and compassion, qualities that are sorely lacking in today’s political climate.
French also addresses the concerns that many conservatives have about Harris’s policy positions. He acknowledges that he does not agree with all of her policies, but argues that no candidate will ever align perfectly with one’s own beliefs. He believes that Harris’s willingness to listen and engage in respectful dialogue makes her a better choice than someone who may share the same views but lacks the ability to work across the aisle.
Furthermore, French argues that a vote for Harris is not just a vote against Trump, but a vote for the future of conservatism. He believes that by voting for Harris, conservatives can send a message that they are ready for a change and are willing to work towards a more inclusive and compassionate future. He also notes that by supporting Harris, conservatives can help to break down the partisan divide and create a more productive and collaborative political environment.
In conclusion, French’s decision to vote for Kamala Harris may seem surprising at first, but upon reading his article, it becomes clear that it is a well-thought-out and principled decision. He believes that Harris has the qualities and values necessary to lead the country in a more positive direction and to “save conservatism from itself.” French’s endorsement of Harris serves as a reminder that in these divisive times, it is important to look beyond party lines and support candidates who have the ability to bring people together and work towards a better future for all.